Glossary entry

English term or phrase:

inapplicable vs. not applicable

English answer:

NOT applicable, for emphasis

Added to glossary by Java Cafe
Oct 20, 2004 05:23
19 yrs ago
18 viewers *
English term

inapplicable vs. not applicable

English Social Sciences Government / Politics paralegal
Which of the two terms, "inapplicable" or "not applicable" is better for the purpose of strongly and unequivocally decreeing that something is: unsuitable, unusable now or in the future, unsuited and not desirable?

The text is addressed to readers/speakers of English in Europe, a mix of non-lawyers and maybe lawyers.

Can you explain the difference between the two terms? Do they have set meanings? Or on the contrary, does the choice of "inapplicable" vs. "not applicable" depend sheerly on the sentence they're used in?

Is "not -" stronger and clearer than "in-" ?

Thank you.

Discussion

Non-ProZ.com Oct 20, 2004:
To: David Moore Not sure "undesirable" would be suitable this time. "Undesirable" used in a literary way and more likely about a person, while in my case it is a formal and unequivocal statement about a thing. I considered "unacceptable" but that seems to convey a mere opinion but not a factual decree.
Non-ProZ.com Oct 20, 2004:
To: Java Cafe Thanks again. :)
Java Cafe Oct 20, 2004:
Please see the comments in my Answer section.
Non-ProZ.com Oct 20, 2004:
inapplicable? Thanks Java and Gareth. I agree that "not applicable" is the strongest one. I also wonder what does the variant "inapplicable" convey and imply, and in which written styles & contexts it might be opted for as the best one? Is "inapplicable" more oblique?

Responses

+8
4 mins
Selected

NOT applicable

This, in my opinion, emphasizes the negative. But, really, this is a matter of personal taste. Both should work equally well.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 34 mins (2004-10-20 05:57:53 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

In my opinion, \"inapplicable\" is more subdued, a bit more \"polite,\" if you will. If I intend to convey the same meaning, but try to keep it as quiet as possible,, I would use \"inapplicable.\" If I wish to be a bit more forceful, I would use \"not applicable.\" If I want to shout, I\'d say, \"NOT applicable.\" :-) The last option, however, is not advised in formal communication. Hope this helps.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hr 0 min (2004-10-20 06:24:13 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

You are welcome, Valters! :-)
Peer comment(s):

agree Refugio
11 mins
Thank you, Ruth!
agree Ramesh Madhavan
23 mins
Thank you, Ramesh!
agree conejo
35 mins
Thank you, Conejo!
agree Sven Petersson
1 hr
Thank you, Sven!
agree Armorel Young : and of course not applicable is often abbreviated to N/A on forms, whereas there is no abbreviation for inapplicable
2 hrs
Thank you, Armorel!
agree Empty Whiskey Glass
4 hrs
Thank you, Svetozar!
agree Olga B
7 hrs
Thank you, Olga!
agree humbird : Yes if you want to stress the negative side, you should use NOT instead of "un" "in" "an" prefixes.
11 hrs
Thank you, Susan!
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "I'd like to thank everyone for helping in discussing this term. :)"
+5
7 mins

Hmmmm............

Depends entirely on the written style and context.

Mostly I would suggest "not" is stronger.

However, you might consider that this answer "does not apply" here. Maybe the the no of words used increases the emphasis?
Peer comment(s):

agree Kristina Thorne : not appropriate would seem to fit the context better
53 mins
Thanks Kristina
agree Armorel Young : yes - although I wonder if it is the right term in the context - not applicable usually means not relevant, not unsuitable or unusable which the asker seems to be wanting
2 hrs
Thanks Amorel, but I don't think we've got anything like enough context to be of much help to the asker here.
agree Empty Whiskey Glass
4 hrs
Thank you.
agree cmwilliams (X) : agree with Armorel - neither term seems to be appropriate here.
4 hrs
Thanks- yes when we get to undesirable- were talking totally different stuff to not aplicable- hence my comment about the answer not applying (in each case/all cases.
agree Alfa Trans (X)
2 days 11 hrs
Thank you.
Something went wrong...
+3
3 hrs

Neither

IMHO, neither is correct - you almost had the right one yourself; to me, "undesirable" gets the ideas you wish to express across FAR better than "not applicable" or "inapplicable".

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 3 hrs 33 mins (2004-10-20 08:56:49 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

An effect can be TOTALLY undesirable, although you\'ve obviously some other word in mind; I think you must consider using an adjective such as \"completely\" (inappropriate?) or \"totally\", \"absolutely\" etc.... And once you have done that, look over your own suggestions again....
Peer comment(s):

agree cmwilliams (X) : with your last comment but would help to have more context.
1 hr
agree Gareth McMillan : Well put.
4 hrs
agree J. Leo (X) : Yes, another word choice seems completely appropriate here. I agree with cm and GMcM here above.
7 hrs
Something went wrong...
21 hrs

Please see explanation

**inapplicable and not applicable means the same, it is a matter of
choice.
**In application forms, people use N/A (not applicable), as it takes
less space.
**Both these words are used primarily to mean that something
(not somebody) is irrelevant or unrelated or inappropriate or
unsuitable or unusable.
**If the word unsuitable is regarding a person, then these 2 words
are not applicable/inapplicable/inappropriate/unusable.
**these 2 words are not used in case of undesirable. These are
inappropriate, as undesirable is mostly about a person.
Undesirable: adj: unwanted, unsuitable,objectionable, distasteful,
unfit, unpleasant. Noun: pariah, reject, outcast.
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search