pendukung bukti

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 jam (2008-01-21 13:16:21 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

dari sini bisa pake tesaurus: berhubung hanya satu jawaban, silakan rekan lain untuk bekerja mencari padanan dari kerangka ini.

Usulan aja sesuai dengan job deskripsinya

http://unit-ops.che.ufl.edu/reports/guides/technical_noteboo...

Corroboration - Investigators must have another technically knowledgeable person read and corroborate the notebook entries: (1) at least once every two weeks while research is in progress and (2) after the project or significant portions of the project are completed. The corroborator must be technically proficient in the area of research reported and be able to understand the entries in the notebook. Any appropriate remarks by corroboration should be written before this statement. Immediately after reading the entries, the corroborator must write, sign and date the following statement, below the most recent entry:
"on this date, I read and understand all of the entries in this notebook from the entry dated ___________________, on page ________________, to and including the most recent entry immediately above."

http://www.neifeld.com/electronicnotebooksandproofofpriority...

The rule requiring corroboration: Evidence of what was invented and when that invention came into existence is generally NOT admissible in the United States Patent and Trademark Office and U.S. courts for the purpose of invalidating claims to the same invention made by another UNLESS it is corroborated by someone other than the inventor. Here, "inventor" means the person or persons who are named on the patent. (I use the word "patent" here to mean either patent or patent application, for simplicity.) Corroboration therefore requires a non-inventor to have reviewed and understood the inventors' work. It is the date of that corroborator's review that defines provable evidence a date of invention. Thus, a co-worker, technician, manager, or even a secretary can corroborate. Of course, it is less likely that a non-technically trained person will understand what they were asked to corroborate, and therefore, it would be harder to prove a right to a date of invention based upon a non technical person's knowledge.