Which CAT tool takes up the least RAM? ناشر الموضوع: Reed James
|
|---|
Reed James
شيلي
Local time: 13:21
عضو (2005)
إسباني إلى أنجليزي
Well, it's obvious that Wordfast Classic is one candidate because it's just a collection of macros. On the other hand, I found MemoQ to slow things down.
| | | | | MetaTexis for Word | Sep 29, 2014 |
Hi James,
MetaTexis also runs in Word, and it also does not use up much RAM (and it is not a collection of macros, but a true, compiled DLL). However, if you use it in Word 2013, it will also be slow. But this is because all add-ins run slow in Office 2013 programs. (Microsoft did a bad job when implementing the add-in feature in the Office 2013 programs.) So, if you would like to run a low memory, add-in program like MetaTexis, use it with Word 2007 or Word 2010, if possible.
... See more Hi James,
MetaTexis also runs in Word, and it also does not use up much RAM (and it is not a collection of macros, but a true, compiled DLL). However, if you use it in Word 2013, it will also be slow. But this is because all add-ins run slow in Office 2013 programs. (Microsoft did a bad job when implementing the add-in feature in the Office 2013 programs.) So, if you would like to run a low memory, add-in program like MetaTexis, use it with Word 2007 or Word 2010, if possible.
Here is the link for downloading the trial version: http://www.metatexis.net/download/MetaTexisForWordV3.exe
(Or, if you need to run it in Word 2013, after all, us this link: http://www.metatexis.net/download/MetaTexisForWordNETV3.exe)
Best regards
Hermann ▲ Collapse
| | | | | Practical use? | Sep 29, 2014 |
What would be the practical use of knowing the answer to your question? Do you need to use a CAT tool on a vintage 1999 PC with 512 KB of RAM? A more relevant question would be: what CAT tools are not able to run at acceptable speed on a standard PC with 4 GB of RAM?
As to Wordfast Classic and MetaTexis, they run as MS Word add-ins, so you would need to include the memory footprint of MS Word in order to obtain meaningful results. Likewise, with Java-based tools, you would need to t... See more What would be the practical use of knowing the answer to your question? Do you need to use a CAT tool on a vintage 1999 PC with 512 KB of RAM? A more relevant question would be: what CAT tools are not able to run at acceptable speed on a standard PC with 4 GB of RAM?
As to Wordfast Classic and MetaTexis, they run as MS Word add-ins, so you would need to include the memory footprint of MS Word in order to obtain meaningful results. Likewise, with Java-based tools, you would need to take into account the memory footprint of the Java Runtime Environment inside which they are running. ▲ Collapse
| | | |
Reed D James wrote:
Well, it's obvious that Wordfast Classic is one candidate because it's just a collection of macros. On the other hand, I found MemoQ to slow things down.
In my case, it is Word that slows down my system. I am happy 90% of my work is not in .doc format
| | | | To report site rules violations or get help, contact a site moderator: You can also contact site staff by submitting a support request » Which CAT tool takes up the least RAM? | TM-Town | Manage your TMs and Terms ... and boost your translation business
Are you ready for something fresh in the industry? TM-Town is a unique new site for you -- the freelance translator -- to store, manage and share translation memories (TMs) and glossaries...and potentially meet new clients on the basis of your prior work.
More info » |
| | CafeTran Espresso | You've never met a CAT tool this clever!
Translate faster & easier, using a sophisticated CAT tool built by a translator / developer.
Accept jobs from clients who use Trados, MemoQ, Wordfast & major CAT tools.
Download and start using CafeTran Espresso -- for free
Buy now! » |
|
| | | | X Sign in to your ProZ.com account... | | | | | |
Login to reply/comment 
Translation news related to CAT tools
