Feb 19, 2022 17:39
2 yrs ago
30 viewers *
English term

On diet

Non-PRO English Art/Literary General / Conversation / Greetings / Letters
Hi All!

I have such an expression in MASH:

Daily at 3:00 p.m., and for an hour, the showers at the 4077th MASH were reserved for the nurses. The nurses, some past the first bloom of youth,
some not on diets, had to pass The Swamp en route to and from their ablutions, and it was a portion of this processional that crossed the field of
vision of Roger the Dodger on one of his trips outdoors to exhort the populace to violation.

Do you understand "not on diets" literally or does it have any other meaning here?

Responses

+8
19 mins
English term (edited): on [a] diet
Selected

being careful what one eats (sometimes for weight loss / avoiding getting fat)

I think you can read it quite literally here.
However, do note that there are other clues from the overall phrasing to the writer's views here:
"Some not on diets" carries a potential implication that many or most of the others would be — i.e. women who were watching their weight. So the writer might be implying "some of the women were a bit fat", while also perhaps expressing the idea that it was standard practice for these young women tp be on diets; they seem to be implying that the slightly older women were perhaps the ones not bothering...
Overall, the writer is syaing that some of the women were attractive (and hence worth observing), but others were less so.
Peer comment(s):

agree Lara Barnett
1 hr
Thanks, Lara!
agree philgoddard
2 hrs
Thanks, Phil!
agree Anastasia Kalantzi
3 hrs
Efharisto, Anastasia!
agree Andre S. M. Pires
3 hrs
Thanks, Andre!
agree AllegroTrans
6 hrs
Thanks, C!
agree Yvonne Gallagher
6 hrs
Thanks, Yvonne!
agree David Hollywood : indeed
9 hrs
Thanks, David!
agree Shera Lyn Parpia
13 hrs
Thanks, Shera!
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
+6
52 mins
English term (edited): not on diet

overweight

From Roger the Dodger's perspective, and given the dubious purpose of his 'trips outdoors', we can safely assumer that 'not on diet' is a deliberate innuendo-laden understatement meaning 'overweight'.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 52 mins (2022-02-19 18:32:22 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

assumer --> assume
Note from asker:
Thank you!
Peer comment(s):

agree Tony M
35 mins
agree Anastasia Kalantzi
2 hrs
agree David Hollywood : just a cute way of avoiding saying they were downright fat lol
5 hrs
agree Tina Vonhof (X)
8 hrs
agree Shera Lyn Parpia
12 hrs
agree Clauwolf
17 hrs
Something went wrong...

Reference comments

22 hrs
Reference:

diets

I don't think you can "safely assume" that "not on diet" equates to "overweight".

Diets have been trendy for years and some women seem to think they are soooo modern to be on the latest diet, whether they are skinny or icverweight.
And yes, there were women dieting post-WW2 and I'm sure during the Korean war too, as is evident here.

https://theconversation.com/how-slimming-became-an-obsession...
Peer comments on this reference comment:

agree Tony M
2 hrs
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search